🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.